What does the new Russian nuclear doctrine mean?

Putin proposed updates to Russia’s nuclear doctrine and military policy, citing new threats. While there are adjustments made, they do not signify a radical departure from previous doctrines

On 25 September, in the biannual standing conference on nuclear deterrence in Russia’s Security Council, President Putin proposed changes to the “fundamentals of state policy of the Russian Federation in the sphere of Nuclear deterrence” or Russia’s nuclear doctrine. Along with the nuclear doctrine, the military doctrine was also proposed to be updated. The rationale of this proposed change was due to the new changes in the military-political realm, factoring in new threats emerging for Russia and its allies—i.e., the increasing intensity of the Ukrainian attacks on Russian soil and the recent request of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky to the United States (US) and the United Kingdom(UK) to strike deep inside Russia using long-range missiles.

Since last year, talks have been held between specialists from the Russian Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the Office of the Security Council on making amendments to Russia’s nuclear doctrine. This new doctrine underlines Moscow’s red lines to further limit Ukraine’s options in striking within Russian territory and is a signal to NATO countries to elicit restraint in its support for Ukraine by limiting Kyiv’s counter-attacks within the Ukrainian theatre.

The launch of conventional weapons such as hypersonic missiles, drones, strategic and tactical aircraft, and cruise missiles towards the Russian border and crossing into the territory of the Russian Federation is justification for the use of nuclear missiles. 

What are the new proposed changes?

The proposed changes will update the 2020 nuclear doctrine and aim to broaden the list of states and alliances against which deterrence can be carried out. The language has evolved wherein a non-nuclear state conducting aggression against Russia with the support of a nuclear state- even using conventional weapons-will be interpreted as a joint attack against Russia. Second, it has reduced the threshold for military attacks inside Russia. The launch of conventional weapons such as hypersonic missiles, drones, strategic and tactical aircraft, and cruise missiles towards the Russian border and crossing into the territory of the Russian Federation is justification for the use of nuclear missiles. Thirdly, while the previous doctrines mentioned Russia calling for nuclear deterrence in defence of an ally, the proposed doctrine calls for a nuclear response in the event of an attack against Belarus, citing Minsk as a party to the treaty establishing the Union State of Russia and Belarus. Further, Putin emphasised the importance of the nuclear triad for the guarantee of Russia’s survival and as an instrument for maintaining the balance in the world.

Read Full Article:

Share This Article

Related Articles

India targets net-zero carbon emissions by 2070, says Modi

India’s economy will become carbon neutral by the year 2070, the country’s prime minster has announced at the COP26 climate crisis summit in Glasgow. The target date is two decades beyond what scientists say is needed to avert catastrophic climate impacts. India is the last of the world’s major carbon polluters to announce a net-zero target, with China saying it would reach that goal in 2060, and the United States and the European Union aiming for 2050.

COP26: What climate summit means for one woman in Bangladesh

China's carbon emissions are vast and growing, dwarfing those of other countries. Experts agree that without big reductions in China's emissions, the world cannot win the fight against climate change. In 2020, China's President Xi Jinping said his country would aim for its emissions to reach their highest point before 2030 and for carbon neutrality before 2060. His statement has now been confirmed as China's official position ahead of the COP26 global climate summit in Glasgow. But China has not said exactly how these goals will be achieved.

Why China's climate policy matters to us all

China's carbon emissions are vast and growing, dwarfing those of other countries. Experts agree that without big reductions in China's emissions, the world cannot win the fight against climate change. In 2020, China's President Xi Jinping said his country would aim for its emissions to reach their highest point before 2030 and for carbon neutrality before 2060. His statement has now been confirmed as China's official position ahead of the COP26 global climate summit in Glasgow. But China has not said exactly how these goals will be achieved.

Deliver on promises, developing world tells rich at climate talks

A crucial U.N. conference heard calls on its first day for the world's major economies to keep their promises of financial help to address the climate crisis, while big polluters India and Brazil made new commitments to cut emissions. World leaders, environmental experts and activists all pleaded for decisive action to halt the global warming which threatens the future of the planet at the start of the two-week COP26 summit in the Scottish city of Glasgow on Monday. The task facing negotiators was made even more daunting by the failure of the Group of 20 major industrial nations to agree ambitious new commitments at the weekend.